Inexpensive polarizing filters might be alluring, but in general they are not a good investment. Many cheap filters are made of poor quality materials that can actually damage your camera lens. Plus, even if the filter itself is good quality, it may not be properly calibrated, which means it won’t do a very good job of filtering out light. If you want to save money, it’s better to buy a less expensive camera and invest in a good quality polarizing filter.
There is no simple answer when it comes to deciding whether or not expensive lens filters are worth the investment. Ultimately, it depends on a number of factors, including the type and quality of the filter, the type of photography you do, and your budget. If you do a lot of professional photography, or if you're simply a hobbyist who wants the best possible quality for your photos, then investing in a high-quality, expensive filter may be worth it. However, if you're on a tight budget, or if you don't do a lot of photography, then
Polar Pro filters are designed to improve the quality of your photos and videos when shooting in bright, sunny conditions. They reduce glare and reflections, and help to bring out the colours in your footage. If you're serious about getting the best possible results from your photography or videography, then Polar Pro filters are definitely worth considering. They may cost more than some other brands, but you're paying for quality and results that you can trust.
A polarizing filter can be used for portraits, but it is important to be aware of how it will affect the image. If the polarizing filter is used to reduce glare, it will also darken the sky and make any white areas appear darker. This can be used to create a more dramatic effect, but it is important to be aware of how it will affect the final image.
4.2/5
Reduces or eliminates glare
Essential for outdoor photography
77mm diameter
Deepens intensity of blue skies
Circular construction
$234
Originally, I got this since it was less expensive than the Hoya low pro version of the same size for my Nikon 10-20 f3.5 DX. I experimented with it for a week, got the Hoya, compared the two, and ultimately gave this one back.Any filter will vignette excessively when used with a wide-angle lens, but this one will do so more than the hoya because it is not as low profile. I can't blame the product for that; I should have known it when I originally bought the thing.Exposure system: I mostly returned the Tiffen and retained the Hoya because this filter made my Nikon's exposure system behave more erratically than the Hoya's did. I was adjusting my exposure compensation (yes, I used center weighted metering) to achieve a balanced exposure by shifting it from roughly -3 to 1 depending on the lighting conditions. I can consistently leave the hoya at any value between -1 and -2 and obtain a more reliable exposure/outcome. This is my first wide angle lens, thus there will be a learning curve for me as well.Weight: Compared to the Hoya low profile filter, this one weighs more. I hope that the fact that DSLRs are already heavy enough won't influence your decision.Overall: Avoid using this with wide-angle lenses! You should be okay for anything else, in my opinion! A friend uses this on his Canon mid-range camera—I believe it has a cropped 16–80mm sensor—and he loves it.
4.2/5
Designed for lenses specifying a 58mm filter thread size
The effect can be seen through the viewfinder and changed by rotating the filter
Best results with SLR cameras
Filter factor varies between 2.3 and 2.8, according to how the filter is rotated and its orientation to the sun
Rotating mount
$234
Originally, I got this since it was less expensive than the Hoya low pro version of the same size for my Nikon 10-20 f3.5 DX. I experimented with it for a week, got the Hoya, compared the two, and ultimately gave this one back.Any filter will vignette excessively when used with a wide-angle lens, but this one will do so more than the hoya because it is not as low profile. I can't blame the product for that; I should have known it when I originally bought the thing.Exposure system: I mostly returned the Tiffen and retained the Hoya because this filter made my Nikon's exposure system behave more erratically than the Hoya's did. I was adjusting my exposure compensation (yes, I used center weighted metering) to achieve a balanced exposure by shifting it from roughly -3 to 1 depending on the lighting conditions. I can consistently leave the hoya at any value between -1 and -2 and obtain a more reliable exposure/outcome. This is my first wide angle lens, thus there will be a learning curve for me as well.Weight: Compared to the Hoya low profile filter, this one weighs more. I hope that the fact that DSLRs are already heavy enough won't influence your decision.Overall: Avoid using this with wide-angle lenses! You should be okay for anything else, in my opinion! A friend uses this on his Canon mid-range camera—I believe it has a cropped 16–80mm sensor—and he loves it.
4.2/5
67mm diameter
Circular construction
Essential for outdoor photography
Deepens intensity of blue skies
Reduces or eliminates glare
$234
Originally, I got this since it was less expensive than the Hoya low pro version of the same size for my Nikon 10-20 f3.5 DX. I experimented with it for a week, got the Hoya, compared the two, and ultimately gave this one back.Any filter will vignette excessively when used with a wide-angle lens, but this one will do so more than the hoya because it is not as low profile. I can't blame the product for that; I should have known it when I originally bought the thing.Exposure system: I mostly returned the Tiffen and retained the Hoya because this filter made my Nikon's exposure system behave more erratically than the Hoya's did. I was adjusting my exposure compensation (yes, I used center weighted metering) to achieve a balanced exposure by shifting it from roughly -3 to 1 depending on the lighting conditions. I can consistently leave the hoya at any value between -1 and -2 and obtain a more reliable exposure/outcome. This is my first wide angle lens, thus there will be a learning curve for me as well.Weight: Compared to the Hoya low profile filter, this one weighs more. I hope that the fact that DSLRs are already heavy enough won't influence your decision.Overall: Avoid using this with wide-angle lenses! You should be okay for anything else, in my opinion! A friend uses this on his Canon mid-range camera—I believe it has a cropped 16–80mm sensor—and he loves it.
4.2/5
Reduces or eliminates glare
Deepens intensity of blue skies
72mm diameter
Essential for outdoor photography
Circular construction
$234
Originally, I got this since it was less expensive than the Hoya low pro version of the same size for my Nikon 10-20 f3.5 DX. I experimented with it for a week, got the Hoya, compared the two, and ultimately gave this one back.Any filter will vignette excessively when used with a wide-angle lens, but this one will do so more than the hoya because it is not as low profile. I can't blame the product for that; I should have known it when I originally bought the thing.Exposure system: I mostly returned the Tiffen and retained the Hoya because this filter made my Nikon's exposure system behave more erratically than the Hoya's did. I was adjusting my exposure compensation (yes, I used center weighted metering) to achieve a balanced exposure by shifting it from roughly -3 to 1 depending on the lighting conditions. I can consistently leave the hoya at any value between -1 and -2 and obtain a more reliable exposure/outcome. This is my first wide angle lens, thus there will be a learning curve for me as well.Weight: Compared to the Hoya low profile filter, this one weighs more. I hope that the fact that DSLRs are already heavy enough won't influence your decision.Overall: Avoid using this with wide-angle lenses! You should be okay for anything else, in my opinion! A friend uses this on his Canon mid-range camera—I believe it has a cropped 16–80mm sensor—and he loves it.
4/5
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Measures 58mm in diameter
Multi-coating reduces reflection
$234
This CPL is significantly superior to the asking price. As far as possible, I attempted to avoid utilizing filters because of the extra time and complexity they entail. I only have a polarizer filter with me. If I have to buy, I typically lean toward nicer brands like B W and Hoya. I have to buy one of these AmazonBasics CPLs just to try it out because they are so inexpensive. It is quite well made. The coating has a perfect appearance. The polarizer rotates smoothly. All is well thus far.In my test, I put it up against a B W multicoated and a Hoya uncoated to see how well it eliminated unwanted reflection. It was impossible for me to distinguish between this AmazonBasics and the B W. There isn't much of a visual difference between the final product and the Hoya. The AmazonBasics transmitted more light as a result of superior coating, but shutter speed was faster for the same outcome. This is an excellent first outcome for a multi-coated CPL that almost cost nothing. I'm continuing testing it, and I'll provide further findings.The images below provide a comparison of three different CPL filters: 1) no filter, 2) AmazonBasics, and 3) top brand name. It is evident that both the brand-name CPL filter and the AmazonBasics CPL filter performed admirably.
4/5
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Measures 52mm in diameter
Multi-coating reduces reflection
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
$234
This CPL is significantly superior to the asking price. As far as possible, I attempted to avoid utilizing filters because of the extra time and complexity they entail. I only have a polarizer filter with me. If I have to buy, I typically lean toward nicer brands like B W and Hoya. I have to buy one of these AmazonBasics CPLs just to try it out because they are so inexpensive. It is quite well made. The coating has a perfect appearance. The polarizer rotates smoothly. All is well thus far.In my test, I put it up against a B W multicoated and a Hoya uncoated to see how well it eliminated unwanted reflection. It was impossible for me to distinguish between this AmazonBasics and the B W. There isn't much of a visual difference between the final product and the Hoya. The AmazonBasics transmitted more light as a result of superior coating, but shutter speed was faster for the same outcome. This is an excellent first outcome for a multi-coated CPL that almost cost nothing. I'm continuing testing it, and I'll provide further findings.The images below provide a comparison of three different CPL filters: 1) no filter, 2) AmazonBasics, and 3) top brand name. It is evident that both the brand-name CPL filter and the AmazonBasics CPL filter performed admirably.
4/5
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Measures 67mm in diameter
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
Multi-coating reduces reflection
$234
This CPL is significantly superior to the asking price. As far as possible, I attempted to avoid utilizing filters because of the extra time and complexity they entail. I only have a polarizer filter with me. If I have to buy, I typically lean toward nicer brands like B W and Hoya. I have to buy one of these AmazonBasics CPLs just to try it out because they are so inexpensive. It is quite well made. The coating has a perfect appearance. The polarizer rotates smoothly. All is well thus far.In my test, I put it up against a B W multicoated and a Hoya uncoated to see how well it eliminated unwanted reflection. It was impossible for me to distinguish between this AmazonBasics and the B W. There isn't much of a visual difference between the final product and the Hoya. The AmazonBasics transmitted more light as a result of superior coating, but shutter speed was faster for the same outcome. This is an excellent first outcome for a multi-coated CPL that almost cost nothing. I'm continuing testing it, and I'll provide further findings.The images below provide a comparison of three different CPL filters: 1) no filter, 2) AmazonBasics, and 3) top brand name. It is evident that both the brand-name CPL filter and the AmazonBasics CPL filter performed admirably.
4/5
Measures 55mm in diameter
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
Multi-coating reduces reflection
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
$234
Since I started taking pictures more than 40 years ago, I have exclusively used Nikon cameras and a range of lenses. High filter quality is crucial. It's simple to purchase cheap filters that obtrusively degrade the imagery, especially if you choose a low-cost option. I was therefore a little cautious to try the " brand" of Amazon Basics. However, it seems like I always need extra filters for my various camera bags. So I tried these out.I was in awe. Without regard to cost, these are some of the greatest filters I've ever used from any manufacturer. For less than the price of another manufacturer's polarizer alone, I was able to get two basic filters (a UV protector and a Circular Polarizer). The polarizer is completely color-neutral, with no hint of yellow, blue, or green. That is crucial!Don't think twice. Purchase some of these before Amazon finds they are charging too little for them.
4/5
Multi-coating reduces reflection
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
Measures 72mm in diameter
$234
This CPL is significantly superior to the asking price. As far as possible, I attempted to avoid utilizing filters because of the extra time and complexity they entail. I only have a polarizer filter with me. If I have to buy, I typically lean toward nicer brands like B W and Hoya. I have to buy one of these AmazonBasics CPLs just to try it out because they are so inexpensive. It is quite well made. The coating has a perfect appearance. The polarizer rotates smoothly. All is well thus far.In my test, I put it up against a B W multicoated and a Hoya uncoated to see how well it eliminated unwanted reflection. It was impossible for me to distinguish between this AmazonBasics and the B W. There isn't much of a visual difference between the final product and the Hoya. The AmazonBasics transmitted more light as a result of superior coating, but shutter speed was faster for the same outcome. This is an excellent first outcome for a multi-coated CPL that almost cost nothing. I'm continuing testing it, and I'll provide further findings.The images below provide a comparison of three different CPL filters: 1) no filter, 2) AmazonBasics, and 3) top brand name. It is evident that both the brand-name CPL filter and the AmazonBasics CPL filter performed admirably.
4/5
Deepens the intensity of blue skies; reduces or eliminates glare
Multi-coating reduces reflection
Ideal for outdoor photography; for use with auto-focus and non-auto-focus cameras
Circular polarizer--one of the most popular special-effect filters
Measures 77mm in diameter
$234
This CPL is significantly superior to the asking price. As far as possible, I attempted to avoid utilizing filters because of the extra time and complexity they entail. I only have a polarizer filter with me. If I have to buy, I typically lean toward nicer brands like B W and Hoya. I have to buy one of these AmazonBasics CPLs just to try it out because they are so inexpensive. It is quite well made. The coating has a perfect appearance. The polarizer rotates smoothly. All is well thus far.In my test, I put it up against a B W multicoated and a Hoya uncoated to see how well it eliminated unwanted reflection. It was impossible for me to distinguish between this AmazonBasics and the B W. There isn't much of a visual difference between the final product and the Hoya. The AmazonBasics transmitted more light as a result of superior coating, but shutter speed was faster for the same outcome. This is an excellent first outcome for a multi-coated CPL that almost cost nothing. I'm continuing testing it, and I'll provide further findings.The images below provide a comparison of three different CPL filters: 1) no filter, 2) AmazonBasics, and 3) top brand name. It is evident that both the brand-name CPL filter and the AmazonBasics CPL filter performed admirably.
A polarizing filter is used on a camera to reduce glare from the sun and other bright light sources. It can also be used to darken blue skies.
Lens filters can affect image quality in a number of ways. First, they can reduce the amount of light that reaches the sensor, resulting in a darker image. Second, they can cause a loss of sharpness and detail. Third, they can introduce a color cast. Finally, they can create a "halo" effect around bright objects.
Yes, professional photographers often use filters to change the appearance of their photos. Filters can be used to improve contrast, add warmth, or protect the lens from scratches.
Yes, professionals use lens filters. They can help protect your lens, reduce glare, and improve your images.
When purchasing a polarizing filter, it is important to take note of the size of your camera lens. The filter should be slightly larger in order to screw onto the lens. If the filter is too small, it will not be able to properly attach to the camera.
A circular polarizer is definitely worth the investment if you do a lot of photography outdoors. It will reduce glare and reflections, and make the colors in your photos pop.
COPYRIGHT © 2019
