Best Mirrorless Camera Lenses in 2022

Last update: December 19, 2022

Are mirrorless lenses better than DSLR?

There is a lot of debate in the photography world about whether mirrorless lenses are better than DSLR lenses. Some people swear by mirrorless cameras, while others prefer DSLRs. So, which is better? It really depends on your needs and preferences as a photographer. If you need a smaller and lighter camera body, then a mirrorless camera might be a better option for you. Mirrorless cameras also tend to have shorter shutter lag times, which can be beneficial if you're shooting action or sports. On the other hand, DSLR cameras usually have better battery life

Are mirrorless lenses better?

Yes, mirrorless lenses are better for a number of reasons. For one, they’re lighter and more compact, which makes them ideal for travel photography. Additionally, mirrorless cameras have shorter flange focal distances, which allows for the use of a wider variety of lenses (including legacy lenses). Finally, mirrorless lenses tend to have faster autofocus and aperture control, making them better suited for action and low-light photography.

Can I use my EF lenses on mirrorless?

Yes, you can use your EF lenses on mirrorless cameras with an adapter. This gives you the ability to use your EF lenses on a wider range of cameras, including mirrorless cameras. The adapter allows you to mount your EF lens to the mirrorless camera, and then you can use the lens as you would on a DSLR camera.

Can you shoot a wedding with a mirrorless camera?

Yes, you can shoot a wedding with a mirrorless camera. In fact, many professional photographers are using mirrorless cameras for weddings and other events. The main advantage of mirrorless cameras is their smaller size and weight, which makes them easier to carry around and use for long periods of time. Additionally, mirrorless cameras have shorter shutter lag times and faster autofocus, which can be helpful when shooting a wedding.


Sony - E 50mm F1.8 OSS Portrait Lens (SEL50F18/B) Review:


Anyone with a Sony a6000 should own this lens. Even though I consider myself to be a novice photographer, this lens can make anything appear to be a pro. The aperture is excellent for taking portraits and focussing on certain objects up close. It is also excellent in low light.It helps me feel better about my skills as a photographer, and my friends and I really adore it.Just a fair warning to anyone considering purchasing: This lens is fairly close up and does not zoom in or out, so you must stand farther away from your subjects to get a full frame. But since the photographs turn out so well, it is not really a drawback.



Meike 50mm f/2.0 Large Aperture Manual Focus MFT M4/3 Lens APS-C for Micro 4/3 System Olympus Panasonic Lumix Mirrorless Cameras Review:


This lens is excellent. I too have a Meike 35mm. I favor manual lenses over automated ones. These newest cameras' cutting-edge features make it simpler to use a manual lens. You can still use the camera's automated features even if you have a manual lens. Manual focusing is substantially enhanced by features like focus peaking, magnification, and a digital tele-converter. They make it incredibly simple and quick. I shoot with an Olympus OMD-E M10 Mark II.The lens creates images that are very reliable. Additionally, photographs can be improved by using Photoshop or other photo-editing software if they need to be slightly sharpened, for example.The manual lens is said to be incapable of handling excessive amounts of motion pictures. I've discovered that to be wholly untrue. I think this lens performs better with motion photos than an automatic one because it has settings like focus peaking. Between each photograph, the camera never needs to focus. I have taken a lot of movies with no issues. Of course, the shutter speed needs to be adequate. Among the many that I took without any problems at all, I have included a few images.The building was photographed from a distance of roughly 100 yards.



PANASONIC LUMIX G II Vario Lens, 100-300MM, MIRRORLESS Micro Four Thirds, Power O.I.S, H-FSA100300 (USA Black) Review:


There isn't, in my opinion, a better value lens available for the G line of cameras. This lens features image stabilization that is comparable to my Canon 100-300 and yet produces excellent images for video at 300mm. Although it might not work well in dim light, it nevertheless does the job and is reasonably priced. The zoom is a little bit stiff at first, but following use, it has loosened up and appears smooth enough for video. Make sure you have a firm tripod for video because the gorilla pod won't be particularly steady for zoom work and the lens seems a touch hefty on the body. The lens shade is the ideal size, and using the lens caps is still possible without removing the shade.Updated January 2018: For such a small and light format, this lens has delivered some of the best long distance animal footage I could have hoped for. The auto focus works quickly, and the video is clear, sharp, and clean. It has excellent bokeh and stabilization that compares favorably to that of my large Canon lenses. Excellently impressed.



Panasonic Lumix G Lens, 25mm, F1.7 ASPH, Mirrorless Micro Four Thirds, H-H025K (USA Black) Review:


1. Background: I've owned a variety of micro 4/3 cameras and lenses; I presently use the Olympus EM10 and EMII with the 12-40mm 2.8 and 40-150mm 2.8 lenses. I also own the superb Panasonic 14mm and 35-100mm 2.8 lenses. Additionally, I've owned and/or rented the 14-150mm super zooms from Olympus, Panasonic, and Tamron, and most recently (and maybe most pertinently for this particular lens), I had the chance to rent and test the 12-60mm 2.8-4.0 pro lenses from Panasonic and Olympus.Given the information above, I'll provide some quick non-scientific observations about this lens.2. Size / Weight: It is a great option for a travel or all-in-one lens because it is lightweight and somewhat compact.3. Image quality: this is the crazy part, but based on my observations (again, wholly unscientific), I think this lens is... sharper (in the corners) than the new "pro" Panasonic 12-60mm 2.8-4.0 as well as the Olympus 12-100mm (shot RAW, tripod, same subject, same apeture, etc.). Even if I might have gotten a "poor clone" of the professional lens, I can unequivocally state that the output of this considerably less expensive lens is on par with or even better than that of its more expensive competitors. 4. In conclusion, this lens is a winner for those looking for a reasonably priced, light/compact lens with a decent zoom range (please don't go for the super zooms because the quality is really subpar). Now, to prove that I'm not completely insane, the "pro" lenses that are better than this one are the Olympus 12-40mm 2.8 and the older Olympus 12-60mm (four thirds).5. In addition, this is one of those situations where it could be beneficial to conduct your own testing because many online reviews of this lens have been quite unfavorable; I don't get it.



Panasonic LUMIX G VARIO 45-150mm F4.0-5.6 ASPH Mirrorless Camera Lens with Optical Stabilizer, Micro Four Thirds Mount, H-FS45150AK (USA Black) Review:


1. Background: I've owned a variety of micro 4/3 cameras and lenses; I presently use the Olympus EM10 and EMII with the 12-40mm 2.8 and 40-150mm 2.8 lenses. I also own the superb Panasonic 14mm and 35-100mm 2.8 lenses. Additionally, I've owned and/or rented the 14-150mm super zooms from Olympus, Panasonic, and Tamron, and most recently (and maybe most pertinently for this particular lens), I had the chance to rent and test the 12-60mm 2.8-4.0 pro lenses from Panasonic and Olympus.Given the information above, I'll provide some quick non-scientific observations about this lens.2. Size / Weight: It is a great option for a travel or all-in-one lens because it is lightweight and somewhat compact.3. Image quality: this is the crazy part, but based on my observations (again, wholly unscientific), I think this lens is... sharper (in the corners) than the new "pro" Panasonic 12-60mm 2.8-4.0 as well as the Olympus 12-100mm (shot RAW, tripod, same subject, same apeture, etc.). Even if I might have gotten a "poor clone" of the professional lens, I can unequivocally state that the output of this considerably less expensive lens is on par with or even better than that of its more expensive competitors. 4. In conclusion, this lens is a winner for those looking for a reasonably priced, light/compact lens with a decent zoom range (please don't go for the super zooms because the quality is really subpar). Now, to prove that I'm not completely insane, the "pro" lenses that are better than this one are the Olympus 12-40mm 2.8 and the older Olympus 12-60mm (four thirds).5. In addition, this is one of those situations where it could be beneficial to conduct your own testing because many online reviews of this lens have been quite unfavorable; I don't get it.



Neewer 35mm F/1.7 Large Aperture Manual Prime Fixed Lens APS-C for Sony E-Mount Digital Mirrorless Cameras A7III,A9,NEX 3,3N,5,NEX 5T,NEX 5R,NEX 6,7,A5000,A5100,A6000,A6100,A6300,A6500 Review:


For the price, this lens is excellent. It clicks into my ancient NEX 5TL effortlessly and firmly (it's made of metal, which surprised me). There is no wiggling. It does take some getting accustomed to the manual aperture and focus, but since I prefer shooting in aperture mode and can fine-tune my focus with other lenses as well, it wasn't a big adjustment for me. Even yet, it's not a negative thing because it makes you more aware of your photos. It's also not really a problem when focus is at its height.It's a good camera for food photography and works well for portraiture (of people and animals). It works well, in my opinion, under dim lighting. My biggest challenge is probably that I can't use my left hand to assist me focus the camera when I try to hold something with one hand and take a picture of it with the other. My biggest pet peeve is undoubtedly that one-handed photography is no longer possible.Although both the aperture ring and the focal ring are quite smooth, changing the aperture ring is a touch too simple, which is fantastic but aggravating. The image at the center is really sharp, but the edges have some distortion. I like that it's not too bulky on my camera and that it has a tiny F-stop of f/1.7 (with Christmas rapidly approaching, I predict that the bokeh from the fairy lights will be fantastic with this lens).Since this lens cannot assist in focusing, I have conflicting thoughts about using it for video. However, it's not too bad if it's mounted on a tripod. Additionally, you may use that awful cinematic technique—which I don't particularly enjoy—where you switch between in- and out-of-focus shots of a group of objects arranged at an angle.Overall, a respectable product, especially considering its price.



Sony SEL28F20 FE 28mm f/2-22 Standard-Prime Lens for Mirrorless Cameras Review:


Without a lens cap, I purchased this secondhand lens from Amazon. This is now my go-to lens for photographing buildings and the streets. I detest using Canon lenses with Sigma mc-11 and Fotodiox adapters because you can't use some Sony features, such MF and DMF focus modes. I enjoy using these settings since you can zoom close on the subject and check to see if it is in focus by turning the focus ring. The focus ring can then be adjusted while you are zoomed in. This lens performed flawlessly when I used it to snap pictures at a wedding in low lighting. Due to the F2.0 lens, I was able to keep the iso low. If I'm not taking portrait photos, I never remove this lens from my camera.check out more examples on my Instagram account. Please be aware that Instagram required cropped images. Facebook: musicman33us



PANASONIC LUMIX Professional 12-35mm Camera Lens G X VARIO II, F2.8 ASPH, Dual I.S. 2.0 with Power O.I.S., Mirrorless Micro Four Thirds, H-HSA12035 (2017 Model, Black) Review:


OverviewJust wonderful lenses. I solely use this lens with my GH5 for video as a professional photographer and videographer. I can't comment on the photographic features of this lens because I haven't used my GH5 to snap a single image, but for video it has exceeded my expectations. When used wide open, this lens offers creamy bokeh, weather sealing when used with the GH5, and quick auto focus. With this lens, I typically use hybrid auto focus, but if it isn't pulling focus well, I'll switch to manual focus.Complaints from other usersA few reviewers I read expressed dissatisfaction with this lens, saying that it was "too zoomed in." Before you purchase a lens like this, folks need to learn how to read lens specifications; this is not a wide-angle lens, and I would not recommend trying to use it on anything other than a tripod. You can stabilize this lens properly and concentrate on the scene rather than the stability using a reliable video tripod or even a steady monopod. This lens is equivalent to a 70-200mm full-frame lens.My AdventureI purchased this lens in order to capture events that are typically too far away for wider-angle film. When zoomed in and filming up close during events, this lens has shown to be excellent for achieving a truly shallow depth of focus. For one shoot, I used this lens set to 100mm, the tele convert function on the GH5, and I was shooting in 4K so that when I delivered the footage to the customer in post, it was in 1080P. This allowed me to punch in another 2x, giving me clear, crisp footage with a shallow depth of field that was almost 600mm FF equivalent! With this little lens, all. The video was nothing short of incredible.You won't be let down by this lens if you require a GH5 lens that is wonderful for events, has a very tiny DOF, is weather sealed, and understands how to properly steady a 70-200mm FF equivalent lens. The GH5's focus transition feature is one of my favorites; I use it constantly in correctly blocked settings. However, this feature only functions if you use native lenses that allow AF. Autofocus also works with this lens, so you can save time by utilizing hybrid AF like I do.ConclusionThis has evolved into my go-to lens for capturing interviews (because to the narrow DOF), events (due to the long reach), and for the cinematic effect, much like my Canon 70-200mm lens for photography (buttery bokeh). This lens is definitely not the best option if you want to attach it to your Crane or Ronin S, but if you have a strong tripod and fluid video head and require a great lens with reach, this is probably the best option for the GH5. Oh, and if you film weddings, stop reading right now and go get this lens; you can thank me later.



PANASONIC LUMIX G II Lens, 20MM, F1.7 ASPH, MIRRORLESS Micro Four Thirds, H-H020AK (USA Black) Review:


I was astounded by this lens's sharpness right away. It is on par with the top M4/3 lenses, including the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 and the Pan/Leica 25mm f/1.4. That makes it a very useful tool for any M4/3 user, as does its small size and f/1.7 maximum aperture. This lens has always received criticism for having a poor autofocus speed. You need not worry if it is your main issue. It swiftly and precisely focuses. Technically speaking, it might be a little bit slower than some other M4/3 lenses, but that difference is probably in the range of a few hundredths of a second, which is hardly noticeable.



Meike 35mm f/1.7 Large Aperture Manual Focus APS-C Lens for Fujifilm X Mount Mirrorless Camera X-T3 X-H1 X-Pro2 X-E3 X-T1 X-T2 X-T10 X-T20 X-A2 X-E2 X-E2s X-E1 X30 X70 X-M1 X-A1 XPro1,etc Review:


This lens is intriguing. Due to the price and the fact that this lens was made by a business I didn't know, I was quite wary of it. I upgraded one of my x-series camera bodies and gave an aspiring photographer my backup ex-1. I regret not having a spare lens to provide. Therefore, I bought this one to put together a cute small starter kit.I thoroughly tested this lens before turning over the camera. It performed admirably. When shot wide open, there is undoubtedly some vignetting and softening at the margins. Its optical performance cost me one point. This vignetting and softness might potentially be advantageous for the correct application, such as artistic portraiture. Surprisingly, the copies I used were sharp in the middle 70–80% of the frame when it was wide open. Naturally, when stopped down, it sharpens up much more from edge to edge. Although not excellent, color and contrast were still adequate.The feel of a lens is one aspect that is challenging to describe. As a professional photographer, I've used Sinar, Hasselblad, Nikon, Canon, and Fuji cameras. Even some of the most beautiful technical lenses I have ever owned lacked personality and life. This lens makes up for its shortcomings in edge sharpness and color rendering with stunning, natural-looking photos.A few significant points.1. Steeples make up the aperture ring. This makes it an intriguing aesthetic decision when using the lens with an x-series camera that has more video capabilities.2. There is no communication between this lens and an x-series camera body. Before installing the lens, make sure the shoot without a lens option is enabled in the camera's menu settings.3. The manual focus has been severely compromised. It has the same quality manual focus lens feel. This not only makes it simple to use for still photography, but it also creates opportunities when attempting to draw precise focus with video, where focus by wire lenses may fail.4. The lens is very stably constructed. It feels like all metal. It feels pretty substantial, however I'm not aware of all the components within.I think I spent about $85 on this lens. I consider anything under $100 to be an excellent deal. It won't replace Fuji's 35 1.4 AF option, which is a fantastic lens, but it looked intriguing enough for the proper job that I decided to buy a second copy after selling the first one.


Do mirrorless cameras take special lenses?

Yes, mirrorless cameras do take special lenses. The reason for this is because mirrorless cameras have a shorter flange distance than DSLRs. This means that the distance between the mount and the sensor is shorter, which requires a different type of lens.

Do professional photographers use mirrorless?

Yes, professional photographers use mirrorless cameras. They are smaller, lighter and quieter than DSLRs, making them ideal for candid and street photography. Mirrorless cameras also have the advantage of being able to shoot silently, which is perfect for wildlife and event photography.

Do wedding photographers use mirrorless cameras?

Yes, some wedding photographers use mirrorless cameras. They may use them for specific purposes, such as shooting in low light or capturing fast action. Some photographers believe that mirrorless cameras produce better image quality than DSLRs.

Does mirrorless last longer than DSLR?

DSLR cameras have been around for a while now, and they are the go-to choice for many professional photographers. However, mirrorless cameras are becoming more popular, and many people are wondering if they will last longer than DSLR cameras. There is no clear answer, as both types of cameras have their pros and cons. However, mirrorless cameras do have some advantages over DSLR cameras, such as being lighter and more compact. Additionally, mirrorless cameras are often more affordable than DSLR cameras, which may make them a more appealing option for some people.

How many lenses should I own?

There's no one answer to this question - it depends on the type of photography you're interested in and how much money you're willing to spend. If you're just starting out, it's probably best to stick to one or two lenses that will cover most of your needs. As you get more experience, you may want to add more lenses to your collection to help you capture different types of shots. Ultimately, it's up to you to decide how many lenses you need - just don't get too caught up in the gear and forget to enjoy the process of taking photos!

Is a 50mm lens good for weddings?

A 50mm lens is a great option for wedding photography. It is versatile and can be used for a variety of shots, from wide shots of the ceremony to close-ups of the bride and groom.