Best Camera Lens Sky and UV Filters in 2022

Last update: December 13, 2022

Are camera UV filters worth it?

There's no denying that UV filters offer a degree of protection for your camera lens. Whether or not that protection is worth the cost is up to you. Some photographers never use UV filters, while others never leave home without one. Ultimately, it's a personal decision.

Are expensive UV filters worth it?

Yes, expensive UV filters are worth it because they offer superior protection against harmful UV rays. These filters block out more UV rays than cheaper filters, making them ideal for people who are looking for the best possible protection against sun damage.

Are UV and skylight filters the same?

No, UV and skylight filters are not the same. UV filters are designed to block out ultraviolet light, while skylight filters are designed to reduce the amount of blue light that enters the camera.

Can you use a skylight filter on a digital camera?

A skylight filter is traditionally used on a camera with a film negative to help reduce the amount of blue in the image. This can be useful when photographing a scene with a lot of sky, as it can help to cut down on the amount of haze in the image. However, skylight filters can also be used on digital cameras to help reduce the amount of blue in the image.


AmazonBasics UV Protection Camera Lens Filter - 67mm Review:


Okay. Very clear, and in most cases has no effect on IQ. I won't criticize this for not having multi-coating because I've experienced poor flare on these less expensive filters in strong light because they are not multi-coated like the B W ones, which cost approximately 8–10 times as much. It comes as standard for a cheap UV filter.Unlike older film cameras, modern cameras DO NOT need UV protection. You would buy this merely to prevent scratches on the front element of your camera lens. In other words, these UV filters give you piece of mind while assisting in raising the value of your lenses when you decide to sell them.Be aware that this filter is constructed of aluminum rather than brass, which is entirely reasonable given the inexpensive cost. Other aluminum filters have a tendency to BIND to aluminum. With these less expensive filters, it has happened to me more than time, and I am NOT happy. However, as long as you are aware of this drawback and comfortable with it (either because you don't need to stack filters or you take great care to avoid overtightening them), this is a respectable layer of lens protection.Recommendable if you have a limited budget, like I do. For crying out loud, grab a B W for the rest of you folks!



AmazonBasics UV Protection Camera Lens Filter - 77mm Review:


Okay. Very clear, and in most cases has no effect on IQ. I won't criticize this for not having multi-coating because I've experienced poor flare on these less expensive filters in strong light because they are not multi-coated like the B W ones, which cost approximately 8–10 times as much. It comes as standard for a cheap UV filter.Unlike older film cameras, modern cameras DO NOT need UV protection. You would buy this merely to prevent scratches on the front element of your camera lens. In other words, these UV filters give you piece of mind while assisting in raising the value of your lenses when you decide to sell them.Be aware that this filter is constructed of aluminum rather than brass, which is entirely reasonable given the inexpensive cost. Other aluminum filters have a tendency to BIND to aluminum. With these less expensive filters, it has happened to me more than time, and I am NOT happy. However, as long as you are aware of this drawback and comfortable with it (either because you don't need to stack filters or you take great care to avoid overtightening them), this is a respectable layer of lens protection.Recommendable if you have a limited budget, like I do. For crying out loud, grab a B W for the rest of you folks!



AmazonBasics UV Protection Camera Lens Filter - 55mm Review:


Sincerely, I don't notice any quality differences between these and my much more expensive filters.I was dubious of the Amazon Basics brand because I already possess similar filters that cost between $20 and $30 apiece, but I reasoned that for a few dollars each, you can't go wrong.The filters were packaged in foam inlay that was cut around them to prevent damage, in addition to being covered in bubble wrap and placed within a hard plastic holder when they arrived.I use these mostly to safeguard my lenses, and I urge everyone else to do the same because replacing a filter is significantly less expensive than replacing a lens.I'll submit photographs that show this filter and the pricey one side by side so that you can all see that there is no difference, but suffice it to say that there isn't. No visual distortion of any type, including flare and color divergence.Constantly astounded with the caliber of Amazon-branded goods.



AmazonBasics UV Protection Camera Lens Filter - 58mm Review:


Okay. Very clear, and in most cases has no effect on IQ. I won't criticize this for not having multi-coating because I've experienced poor flare on these less expensive filters in strong light because they are not multi-coated like the B W ones, which cost approximately 8–10 times as much. It comes as standard for a cheap UV filter.Unlike older film cameras, modern cameras DO NOT need UV protection. You would buy this merely to prevent scratches on the front element of your camera lens. In other words, these UV filters give you piece of mind while assisting in raising the value of your lenses when you decide to sell them.Be aware that this filter is constructed of aluminum rather than brass, which is entirely reasonable given the inexpensive cost. Other aluminum filters have a tendency to BIND to aluminum. With these less expensive filters, it has happened to me more than time, and I am NOT happy. However, as long as you are aware of this drawback and comfortable with it (either because you don't need to stack filters or you take great care to avoid overtightening them), this is a respectable layer of lens protection.Recommendable if you have a limited budget, like I do. For crying out loud, grab a B W for the rest of you folks!



AmazonBasics UV Protection Camera Lens Filter - 52mm Review:


Okay. Very clear, and in most cases has no effect on IQ. I won't criticize this for not having multi-coating because I've experienced poor flare on these less expensive filters in strong light because they are not multi-coated like the B W ones, which cost approximately 8–10 times as much. It comes as standard for a cheap UV filter.Unlike older film cameras, modern cameras DO NOT need UV protection. You would buy this merely to prevent scratches on the front element of your camera lens. In other words, these UV filters give you piece of mind while assisting in raising the value of your lenses when you decide to sell them.Be aware that this filter is constructed of aluminum rather than brass, which is entirely reasonable given the inexpensive cost. Other aluminum filters have a tendency to BIND to aluminum. With these less expensive filters, it has happened to me more than time, and I am NOT happy. However, as long as you are aware of this drawback and comfortable with it (either because you don't need to stack filters or you take great care to avoid overtightening them), this is a respectable layer of lens protection.Recommendable if you have a limited budget, like I do. For crying out loud, grab a B W for the rest of you folks!



Tiffen 67mm UV Protection Filter Review:


It is no longer accurate to say that these serve as "UV filters." In the case of film, adding this filter improved clarity by blocking some wavelengths that the film had amplified in haze and glare, but it appears that this is not a problem with digital. These actually provide as lens front element protection, but doing so has a price. The quality of the image is somewhat diminished by each piece of glass that you let light enter through.I have a number of them, and while I'm out sightseeing and taking pictures with my digital SLRs, the value of protection out in the world outweighs any image degradation for me. These detach for use indoors or in the studio. For the aforementioned haze filtering qualities, I also use them on my Mamiya RZ lenses when taking film outside. It is incredibly convenient that all of my Mamiya lenses have a 77mm thread on the front.



Tiffen 77mm UV Protection Filter Review:


It is no longer accurate to say that these serve as "UV filters." In the case of film, adding this filter improved clarity by blocking some wavelengths that the film had amplified in haze and glare, but it appears that this is not a problem with digital. These actually provide as lens front element protection, but doing so has a price. The quality of the image is somewhat diminished by each piece of glass that you let light enter through.I have a number of them, and while I'm out sightseeing and taking pictures with my digital SLRs, the value of protection out in the world outweighs any image degradation for me. These detach for use indoors or in the studio. For the aforementioned haze filtering qualities, I also use them on my Mamiya RZ lenses when taking film outside. It is incredibly convenient that all of my Mamiya lenses have a 77mm thread on the front.



Tiffen 58mm UV Protection Filter Review:


It is no longer accurate to say that these serve as "UV filters." In the case of film, adding this filter improved clarity by blocking some wavelengths that the film had amplified in haze and glare, but it appears that this is not a problem with digital. These actually provide as lens front element protection, but doing so has a price. The quality of the image is somewhat diminished by each piece of glass that you let light enter through.I have a number of them, and while I'm out sightseeing and taking pictures with my digital SLRs, the value of protection out in the world outweighs any image degradation for me. These detach for use indoors or in the studio. For the aforementioned haze filtering qualities, I also use them on my Mamiya RZ lenses when taking film outside. It is incredibly convenient that all of my Mamiya lenses have a 77mm thread on the front.



Tiffen 49mm UV Protection Filter Review:


It is no longer accurate to say that these serve as "UV filters." In the case of film, adding this filter improved clarity by blocking some wavelengths that the film had amplified in haze and glare, but it appears that this is not a problem with digital. These actually provide as lens front element protection, but doing so has a price. The quality of the image is somewhat diminished by each piece of glass that you let light enter through.I have a number of them, and while I'm out sightseeing and taking pictures with my digital SLRs, the value of protection out in the world outweighs any image degradation for me. These detach for use indoors or in the studio. For the aforementioned haze filtering qualities, I also use them on my Mamiya RZ lenses when taking film outside. It is incredibly convenient that all of my Mamiya lenses have a 77mm thread on the front.



Tiffen 52mm UV Protection Filter Review:


It is no longer accurate to say that these serve as "UV filters." In the case of film, adding this filter improved clarity by blocking some wavelengths that the film had amplified in haze and glare, but it appears that this is not a problem with digital. These actually provide as lens front element protection, but doing so has a price. The quality of the image is somewhat diminished by each piece of glass that you let light enter through.I have a number of them, and while I'm out sightseeing and taking pictures with my digital SLRs, the value of protection out in the world outweighs any image degradation for me. These detach for use indoors or in the studio. For the aforementioned haze filtering qualities, I also use them on my Mamiya RZ lenses when taking film outside. It is incredibly convenient that all of my Mamiya lenses have a 77mm thread on the front.


Do camera lenses need UV filters?

Most camera lenses come with a UV filter already attached to the front element. These filters block ultraviolet (UV) light from reaching the lens. This is important because UV light can cause haze and affect the sharpness of your images. Some photographers choose to remove the UV filter from their lenses, but this is generally not recommended. UV filters do not affect image quality, and they can actually help to protect your lens from scratches, dirt, and other types of damage.

Do professional photographers use UV filters?

Most professional photographers do not use UV filters because they are not necessary. UV filters were originally designed to protect the camera lens from damage from UV rays. However, modern camera lenses are already coated with a UV filter, so there is no need to use an additional UV filter. UV filters can also cause image quality problems, such as increased flare and decreased sharpness.

Do skylights block UV rays?

Does UV filter degrade picture quality?

Most photographers believe that UV filters degrade picture quality because they cause a loss of sharpness and clarity. However, UV filters can actually help to protect your lens and camera sensor from damage.

How do I choose a UV filter for my lens?

When choosing a UV filter for your lens, consider the following factors: -The size of your lens -The type of lens (telephoto, wide-angle, etc.) -The amount of light you'll be shooting in -Your budget Once you've considered these factors, you can narrow down your choices and select the UV filter that's right for you.

Is a UV filter the same as a polarizer?

A UV filter blocks out ultraviolet light, which can be harmful to your eyes and skin. A polarizer blocks out reflected light, which can make your photos appear washed out.